Blog

Drawing Through the Pandemic

The week of March 9th was a slow chipping away at all that structured my life as an MFA student. Classes moved online, my thesis review and exhibition became a question mark, and grads were ordered to leave their studios. It felt like my cohort community was evaporating without warning or ceremony; I felt heartbroken and entirely disoriented. COVID-19 had only recently touched down in the U.S., and the reality of its danger hadn’t yet sunk in—nor had the reality of a global economic crisis.

Two experiences that week stand out from the haze. On Thursday, I visited an older artist’s home studio. I saw her magnificent, abstract drawings and paintings spanning decades and two coasts, as well as the precious works she’d collected over the years from friends. Secondly, on Friday, one of my professors was making harmonograph drawings in the school lobby with any one who chanced to pass by and show interest. I stopped to make one and was quickly lifted by the perfection of the machine, the beauty of the drawings, and the persistence of my mentor’s rational mind amidst the insanity of the moment. In both cases, I felt healed by a generosity coiled like a spring within thoughtful, beautiful art.

I’ve always been skeptical of how useful we artists really are to society. I think a good deal about whether art should serve as a call to action in troubled times, and if rather than being “moving,” art should move its viewers to act. But my experiences the week of March 9th gave me new perspective.

Since March 17th, I’ve spent a good portion of each day working on abstract drawings in a cleared-out corner of the house. It’s important to acknowledge my privilege, here. No one in my family is sick, I have a stable home and a nourishing partnership with my husband, and we have a little bit of savings. Not all artists have the capacity to make work right now, and I count myself blessed. The drawings make use of random, leftover materials that I distractedly grabbed from my studio before the school locked its doors, or that I happened to have lying around the house. This includes a few colors of ink and dye, some green latex house paint, and a bit of half-dried orange acrylic. Fortuitously, I had a stack of 9” x 12” watercolor paper in the house, leftover from a workshop that I taught this fall with poor attendance. These are parameters born of necessity, stores are closed and money is tight. But it feels poignant to work with materials that I don’t have control over, to figure out how to make use of what’s at hand (as artists have done for centuries). In 2016, at the Architectural Association School of Architecture in London, Brian Eno gave a lecture where he talked about art as a way for people to rehearse the critical life skill of negotiating between control and surrender, or going with the flow. I think that’s right. Drawing through the pandemic creates space for me to process what’s happening, while it exercises the mental faculties that we all need to face this moment—to be nimble, to control what we can and accept what we cannot.

College Art Association Conference 2020

Going to the CAA Conference this year? Stop by Salon C-6 at 2 PM on February 13th to watch me spend 7 minutes defending beauty within contemporary art. See the abstract and more details below…

A CASE FOR BEAUTY:

A Case for Beauty presents a critique of Arthur C. Danto's 2003 book, The Abuse of Beauty, from the perspective of a working artist and art educator. Danto's argument that a work of art’s meaning can never be fully determined outside its social political context, that “aesthetic attributes do not stand alone,” bears massive relevance today. However, Danto’s implication that artists cannot wield beauty in service of social progress feels short-sighted. The diverse practices of Nick Cave, Kerry James Marshall, and Joan Semmel offer just a few examples of how contemporary artists do employ beauty in works that pointedly address social politics. Beauty’s unique power to compel an audience to see and consider an image carries radical potential. Beauty today may act as a Trojan horse, a lure for transmitting to viewers the messages and questions that can inspire positive action.

CAA screenshot-page-001.jpg

Landscape

This summer, I’ve been working on collecting my thoughts around landscape painting into a new essay. Here’s a bit:

Colin Woodard’s 2011 book American Nations interprets the United States as a precarious coalition of eleven warring regions. Woodard tells U.S. history through the lens of tracking each region’s evolution and migrations within the country over time, from the first arrivals of European settlers to the present. The book was a revelation to me, in that it theorized a truth that I’d sensed of my country for years, particularly after the 2016 election.

I’ve always been fascinated by how, in the United States, different worldviews center around distinct, geographic regions. When I was three, my parents, sick of the cold in their bones, uprooted their lives from Michigan and set off for sunny central Florida. For the first few years of my life, I drank “pop” and called my parents’ friends by their first names, but in Florida I was raised amidst Southern, conservative culture. Our household somehow managed to embrace it all while maintaining pride in our Northern roots, while nurturing my sister and I’s sense of Jewish heritage and our secular, science-oriented worldview.

Recently, I took a road trip from Philadelphia to Orlando. In North Carolina, I was struck by bright yellow billboards punctuating the walls of foliage lining I-95, reading “Jesus is Savior,” or more concisely, “REPENT.” In South Carolina, a roadside field had been cleared for an enormous confederate flag. From the car, the landscape seemed to back up Woodard’s thesis of America’s cultural pluralism. The views from my window also seemed the perfect illustration of how landscape is more than land shaped by practical human needs; landscape is branded by the ideology of its inhabitants.

Trump country is beautiful. There’s tension in the thought because the landscape’s formal and political reality are at odds (for me, at least). There’s an awkwardness to feeling moved by a landscape that’s intimately tied to a culture far from one’s own. I think the discomfort is telling; it suggests some reciprocity between a place and its people, it implies landscape’s animacy. Another way to think of it might be that landscape is steeped, ontologically, in its human history.

Winter Studio Notes

  • How do you communicate the sense of humans’ meaningful relationship to landscape, instead of just talking about your own, private relationships to specific places (central Florida, grandparents’ farm, Pennsylvania, etc.)? The latter flirts with inaccessibility and sentimentality.

  • "What you’re making, it's not an abstract painting, and it's not a landscape. It's a cerebral construction." (Dona Nelson)

  • "You must have the illusion of space in the painting, for the signage of space to be activated." (also Dona)

  • Integrate the abstract and representational parts, make them need each other.

  • Why landscape imagery at all?

  • I’m not interested in painting as an illustration of the idea.

  • Why am I so allergic to physical terrain in the painting, or to using actual collage? I want a singular place, a singular illusion. There's something about the entire painting having the same skin that goes to this, to holding all those disparate parts together the way I want.

  • Ways that the work may be problematic (just a few):

    • aestheticizing, showing as beautiful the modern-industrial world

    • suggesting some sort of symbiosis between modernity and nature

    • underpinned by the romanticization of nature/landscape

What’s on the wall: